Category: Comment by a Science Journalist

Vaccines Revealed#Marines#Navy#CoastGuard

jlvranes Leave a comment

Breaking News!  CDC caught lying, and destroying evidence about the link between autism, and numerous other illnesses, and death in connection with Vaccines!

It has taken 40+ hours of interviews, just to cover the basics in the docuseries below.

Vindication for the many military who have been ignored, in regards to the health dangers with the Anthrax Vaccine.

Hope on the horizon, with a new government administration, not wasting any time in counseling with experts on the many health threats that have been swept under the rug..

Priceless, knowledge.  Check it out.

http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/

New Nordic Cochrane Centre Complaint Destroying HPV ‘Safe and Effective’ Narrative#Gardasil#HPVVaccine#Cervarix

jlvranes Leave a comment
Written By: Jeffrey Jaxen

Piece by piece the foundation and historical legacy of the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine is fast approaching the reality anticipated by former pharmaceutical industry physician with Gardasil manufacturers Merck when he stated in 2014, “I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all times…” 

In Europe, the ‘safe and effective’ HPV misinformation appears to have run its course. Receiving no coverage by mainstream media sources, the Nordic Cochrane Centre has filed its second complaint in five months – this time to the European ombudsman – over maladministration at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in relation to the safety of the HPV vaccines.

According to the Nordic Cochrane Centre, its first complaint to the EMA filed on May 26, 2016 was met with replies that did not fully address their concerns. The Centre writes in its new complaint that…

Continue to the Article Here

Peer Review Process in Academic Publishing Untrustworthy#android#iPad#retweet

jlvranes Leave a comment

by Rishma Parpia

The peer review process is the pride of rigorous academic publishing. It is a critical component used to maintain the integrity of academic publications and a method used to ensure that information appearing in the scientific and medical literature is thoroughly vetted for accuracy.

How Does Peer Review Work?

The process begins after a researcher submits a paper to an academic journal. The editors of the journal then assign a group of independent reviewers to evaluate and critique the content of paper.1 Often, the researcher submitting the study will offer names of scholars in their field of study who are qualified to undertake the reviews. However, the final decision on the selection of reviewer typically lies in the hands of the journal editors.1

After the reviewers are appointed, they are required to investigate the research methodology used to conduct the study and provide feedback on any further improvements that can be made.1 In cases where the research methodology is flawed, reviewers have the ability to reject the paper. Typically, reviewers have no direct contact with the researchers and communicate their feedback via the editors of the journal who then decide to accept or reject the paper for publication.1

The Fake Peer Review Outbreak…

Continue to the Article Here

http://www.thevaccinereaction.org