Exclusive: Woman Injured by Gardasil Vaccine Shares How COVID Shots Injured Her Mother and Ended the Life of Her Grandmother

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

“In 2012, when she was 20 years old, Rochelle was so injured by Merck’s Gardasil vaccine that she had to give up her pre-med studies. Ten years later, her mother was injured by Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine, and shortly after, her grandmother died just a few weeks after getting Pfizer’s vaccine.”

Read the full article…

HPV vaccines: My Daughter’s Lost Years

By Fiona Mackenzie, Cromdale, Grantown on Spey, Highlands of Scotland

Chelsea had 2 injections of Cervarix in the fall of 2012 before we went to Australia. A few months after we returned, we took her in for the third jab.  The GP practice stated that they didn’t stock Cervarix any longer, but would check whether they could use Gardasil to finish the series.   The next week in May 2013 she had her final vaccination, but it was Gardasil, not Cervarix.  I did not question this because I trusted the doctor to protect her health. However, looking back I had so little information to go on at the time, I certainly should have questioned the decision to mix the two HPV vaccines.  Until after the third injection, Chelsea was a normal healthy girl.

In late August of the same year, she started complaining of back pain. At first, I discounted it but 3 weeks later it had become so serious we had to take her back to the doctor.  She was referred for physio, but it did not help.  As time went on, Chelsea became increasingly disabled by her now constant back pain.

By late September she could not manage to get out of bed very often.  School attendance became impossible as the pain spread to other joints in her body, mainly her neck, knees, and legs.  We were now regular visitors to our local GP.  Chelsea was referred for an urgent MRI.  The results returned 5 days later showing mild edema on her anterior spinal column.  Her GP suspected Lyme disease, but the test results came back negative.

On December 3rd, 2013, Chelsea’s GP admitted her to the Children’s Ward.  Her symptoms at the time were a persistent pain in her back, lower and upper limbs, sleeping problems, loss of grip strength, paraesthesia (tingling, numbness) in her hands, intermittent tingling in her arms and legs, and no reflexes.  During her 4 day stay, Chelsea had various specialists trying to find her reflexes but all were unable to do so. She also had a lumbar puncture, nerve conductive studies, and blood tests.  The doctors reported that nothing of great interest was found.

By this time, Chelsea had not been in school for more than 3 months and was able to complete only small amounts of regular schoolwork at home.

The next few months Chelsea spent in bed. If I took her out, she would have to use either crutches or a wheelchair.  She was in constant pain and being treated with a cocktail of Amitriptyline, Ibuprofen, Solphadol, and Dihydrocodeine.

By February 2014, she also developed headaches during which her eye became swollen so the GP added an anti-migraine drug (Pizotifen).   Chelsea also struggled with dizziness and developed strange food intolerances.

Things finally started to improve a bit by April 2014 so Chelsea was able to return to school for 2 hours a day.

Later in April, she saw a different GP who changed her cocktail of drugs because the doctor felt Chelsea must be “drugged” and this was not helping her.  Around the same time, she began taking advice from and being treated by a homeopath. Chelsea decided for herself that the only true way to detox was to stop her medications.  This seemed possible because her symptoms decreased as she removed various prescription drugs from her daily medical cocktail.

By June, Chelsea had improved enough to be able to return to school for the mornings. Her most recent MRI scan showed that she no longer had swelling on her spine and her general health was somewhat improved.  She was now in year 4 in school but had missed all of year 3 with the exception of a few hours.  She still had daily pain and various strange symptoms, but she learned to cope with them.  We were still having follow up medical appointments on a regular basis.

We never obtained an official diagnosis for Chelsea – which has hugely affected her life. Having no formal diagnosis made her feel like no one believed her symptoms were real. When the medical professionals kept telling her they could find nothing wrong, I am sure there were times when she questioned her own sanity.

There is no doubt in my mind that HPV vaccines played a part in changing my daughter from a healthy young girl into one who was constantly sick with a long journey to recovery. After all, the only change in her life prior to the appearance of all these new medical conditions was being vaccinated with Cervarix and Gardasil.

Fast forward three years to September 2018: Has my daughter recovered? Has Chelsea regained some sense of normality in her life? The answers to these questions are both “NO”!

Chelsea has had to battle mental health problems. I strongly believe these issues stem from the long-term chronic illness she had to endure during her teenage years. These years changed my daughter’s entire outlook on life. I rarely understand her reasoning with things. At times I despise her ways. However, writing her story has made me stop and think. The happy go lucky girl I had pre-vaccine is probably gone forever.

Would she have developed mental health problems had she not had the HPV vaccines? Unlikely, I expect. Spending so many of your teen years bed-bound with no real support from the medical community most definitely takes its toll. Chelsea was a bright scholar in primary. She was advanced a year in reading and took great pride in her 100% attendance record. She has the certificates to prove that. She walked out of high school in the 6th year with only a few Nat 5 as she had such poor attendance. She was so unwell she could not manage 1 higher.

Today she still suffers multiple symptoms, including endless lethargy and suicidal thoughts. Chelsea is now an unhappy 19-year-old without much focus. This young lady readily admits that during her illness she felt virtually abandoned by the medical profession.

As her mother, I cannot help but believe her current mental issues might not be so profound had she felt supported and cared for by those who were supposed to help her heal.

Thank you for taking the time to read this.  Quite honestly, it was not at all easy to write the story of our life over the past few years. Doing so brought a flood of emotions back to the surface.

Instead of watching with pride as Chelsea worked to achieve her hopes and dreams, our family fought to cope with all of her new (and still unexplained) medical problems. Instead of celebrating the milestones teenage girls typically experience during high school, our family spent these precious years feeling abandoned and betrayed by a medical system we trusted to care for her health and well-being. We suffered along with Chelsea as her youthful enthusiasm turned to bitter despair. We would give anything to be able to turn back the hands of time.

Unfortunately, our family is not alone. Families around the world are experiencing similar events after HPV vaccinations.

When is it all going to end? When are people in the medical profession going to have the courage to stand up and fight for our children?

 

This article in it’s entirety, is compliments of  www.SaneVax.org

How closely does the CDC monitor HPV vaccine safety?#POTS#VaccineSafety#HPV

By Norma Erickson

SaneVax-FeaturedDecember 4, 2013, the Katie Couric Show aired several segments focusing on The HPV Vaccine Controversy. Her guests included Emily TarsellRosemary and Lauren Mathis, Dr. Diane Harper and Dr. Mallika Marshall.

In response to the ensuing firestorm of criticism the show generated, Katie Couric invited Dr. Anne Schuchat, Assistant Surgeon General and Director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, to do a segment for Friday’s show in order to “make sure people understand the facts about this vaccine and human papillomavirus (HPV).”

Dr. Schuchat’s answers to Katie Couric’s questions can be viewed in the video above, or on HPV Vaccine Conversation Continued. During the interview Dr. Schuchat was asked about the safety of HPV vaccines, she stated:

“As the leader of the CDC Immunization Program, I am really committed to a very strong safety monitoring system. What I can say is more than 57 million doses have been used and with all the tests and systems that we track, we aren’t finding any concerning problems.”

Really, Dr. Schuchat – No concerning problems?

According to the CDC, VAERS data are monitored to:

  • Detect new, unusual, or rare vaccine adverse events
  • Monitor increases in known adverse events
  • Identify potential patient risk factors for particular types of adverse events
  • Identify vaccine lots with increased numbers or types of reported adverse events
  • Assess the safety of newly licensed vaccines

Ostensibly, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is the first line of defense when monitoring vaccine safety. Despite the obvious limitations of drawing concrete conclusions from VAERS data, it does provide an excellent tool for recognizing potential safety signals, red flags if you will, when looking at a specific vaccine’s safety profile.

This article will look at a few items which would raise red flags for the average medical consumer. Perhaps Dr. Schuchat can explain why they are not ‘concerning problems’ for the leader of the CDC Immunization Program.

According to the Rare Diseases Act of 2002, any disease or condition that affects less than 200,000 people in the United States is classified as a rare disease. There are currently more than 6,000 known rare diseases. One could safely assume that if one or more of these rare diseases began to show up in the VAERS database with any regularity it would certainly constitute a safety signal – a signal demanding further investigation.

Let’s take a look at a few examples of VAERS data that should at the very least raise a few eyebrows.

HPV Vaccines and ADEM

According to the NIH, National Institute of Health, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is characterized by a brief but widespread attack of inflammation in the brain and spinal cord that damages myelin – the protective covering of nerve fibers.  ADEM often follows viral or bacterial infections, or less often, vaccination for measles, mumps, or rubella.

In other words, ADEM is a known side effect of some vaccines. It is listed as a rare disease in both the United States and Europe. Examine the following chart showing the VAERS reports of ADEM after all vaccines used in the United States each year from May 1997 through May 2013.

1-ADEM

One would think an 8,100% average per anum increase in reports of this rare condition after the introduction of HPV vaccines would be a huge red flag. Apparently, that is not the case for Dr. Schuchat despite the fact that ADEM is a known adverse effect of some vaccines.

HPV Vaccines and POTS

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is one of a group of rare disorders that have orthostatic intolerance (OI) as their primary symptom (when an excessively reduced volume of blood returns to the heart after an individual stands up from a lying down position). In POTS, orthostatic intolerance causes lightheadedness or fainting, and there is also a rapid increase in heartbeat.

The following chart shows VAERS reports of POTS and related symptoms after HPV vaccines compared to the number of reports filed after all other FDA approved vaccines.

2-POTS-related-symptoms

There are over 80 vaccines FDA approved for use in the United States. If all vaccines were equally safe, HPV vaccines should account for around 3% of the total reports filed with VAERS. As you can clearly see, depending upon the symptom, HPV vaccines account for a disproportionate percentage of the reports filed pertaining to POTS and related symptoms. What is wrong with this picture?3-POTS-increase

Still – no ‘concerning problems’ Dr. Schuchat? Not with an average increase of 137% in reports filed per year?

HPV Vaccines and ITP

Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) occurs when immune system cells produce antibodies that destroy platelets, which are necessary for normal blood clotting. The antibodies attach to the platelets. The spleen destroys the platelets that carry the antibodies.

The chart below illustrates the average number of reports of purpura on an annual basis for all vaccines listed in the VAERS database. There has been a 68% increase in the average number of purpura cases reported annually since the introduction of HPV vaccines in 2006.

4-ITP-increase

Seriously, Dr. Schuchat, wouldn’t this fall under the heading of potential unusual vaccine adverse events which the VAERS system is designed to alert the members of your staff to investigate?

HPV Vaccines and Infertility

Infertility in the United States is no small problem. The CDC estimates that 10.9% of women ages 15 to 44 experience fertility problems. This estimate was made from data collected from 2006-2010. Since this is not a rare disorder, one would think that any signal which indicated a tendency to exacerbate the problem would be of particular concern.

5-Infertility-increase

OK, the chart above shows a substantial increase of the reports of fertility problems, a 790% increase in the annual average to be exact beginning in 2007. What could have caused such an increase? Does it have anything to do with the introduction of HPV vaccines in mid-2006?

Let’s compare the percentage of infertility reports after HPV vaccines to infertility problems reported after all other vaccines in the VAERS database from May 2007 to November 2013.

6-Infertility-comparison

Dr. Schuchat, how can 2 vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, account for such a large percentage of infertility reports to VAERS for such an extended period of time without being a concern?

One Final Chart

7-Adverse-Event-comparison

Once again, Dr. Schuchat, how can two vaccines account for such a large percentage of the VAERS database? Why is this not a matter of concern?

Perhaps the mission statement for the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Illness says it all:

“The mission of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) is the prevention of disease, disability, and death through immunization and by control of respiratory and related diseases.”

The amount of disease, disability, and death potentially caused by Gardasil and Cervarix are obviously not a ‘concerning problem’ for those who are supposed to be monitoring HPV vaccine safety at the CDC.

Thank you, Dr. Schuchat, for making that perfectly clear to medical consumers in the United States and around the world.

For more revealing graphs, click here.

Read this article in French here.

This article in it’s entirety is complements of SaneVax.org

Brianna: Surviving Post-Cervarix Syndrome#Parent#Vaccines#HPV

By Laura Price, Newport Pagnell, Buckinghamshire UK

Brianna's life after Cervarix

Brianna’s life after Cervarix

My daughter, Brianna, was an active dancer since the age of 2 and a member of the school athletic team. She has always been fit and healthy and very academic.

On September 28th 2011 at age 12 she had her first dose of the Cervarix vaccine. Shortly thereafter everything changed.

During the next 3 weeks she became increasingly unwell, experiencing fatigue, insomnia, constant nausea, increased body temperature, hot flushes, headaches and muscle and joint pain. She would attempt to go to school, but they would just send her home.

Her GP carried out several blood and urine tests, but all results were negative. We asked the GP could it be a reaction to the vaccine. Our GP contacted the manufacturers who confirmed that her symptoms were recognised reactions, but not generally after this length of time. However, our GP advised that she should not have the 2nd and 3rd doses of the vaccine in case.

Over the next 6 months Brianna could not handle more than 1 or 2 hours a week at school, some weeks there was no attendance. She also had to give up all sports and dancing.

To learn more about this period of Brianna’s life, read her original story here.

Post-Cervarix Syndrome: The next few years

In April 2012, after seeing the Paediatrician at our local hospital, she was referred to Gt Ormond Street Hospital to see the ME specialist team led by Dr Vic Larcher. It was then she received a diagnosis of CFS/ME (chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis).

When we asked him if the vaccine could be the cause, his simple reply was, “I am treating a lot more girls with CFS/ME since its introduction.”

Since then treatment has been regular physiotherapy and for 18 months she had psychology to help her deal with having a chronic condition.

Brianna now has to take 20mg of Amitriptyline a day to help her sleep at night, co-codamol every day for pain relief and anti-nausea medication as and when required. She has also been having hydrotherapy and is currently waiting to get a TENS machine for pain relief.

After two and a half years, Brianna could manage to attend up to 11 hours of schooling a week. She has been further diagnosed with Raynaud’s disease, hypermobility syndrome and postural hypertension.

Brianna has a very small circle of 4 close friends, having lost a lot of social contact due to not being well enough to attend school and do all that other healthy teenagers do. This serves to make her feel even more isolated.

By February 2016, Brianna successfully gained high grades in 7 GCSE’s after a part-time timetable at school and a lot of self-teaching at home.

She now attends the 6th form and is studying 3 (the norm is 4) A-levels over a 12-hour week, only going in for lessons and doing all study periods at home. However, it is not often that she manages the entire 12 hours.

She still has a small circle of friends. Due to the increased work load at school, we have to keep an eye on social time to ensure she does not overdo things and miss important time in school. She tried to start dancing again, but unfortunately had to stop as she was finding it too much to handle.

She still has regular physiotherapy to work on increasing her exercise time. She had a goal of being able to go on a school trip to Barcelona in July of this year and the school would only let her take part if her physiotherapist confirmed that she was fit enough. She did manage to go, however, it then meant she missed the week of school after her return, as she was so tired.

Brianna continues to take amitriptyline to help her sleep at night and attends hospital in London twice a year to be seen by a CFS/ME consultant who monitors her progress.

She has passed her driving test and has her own car, which is a great help in preserving her energy levels and enables her to easily get to and from school.

We have been looking at further education at University, but at this stage Brianna really is not sure if she would be able to cope.

She spent a lot of time trying to find a part time job, like her friends have, but it was very difficult to find something that she could cope with without over doing it. She now has a small job helping in a local hairdressers and they are very understanding of her condition and work around the hours she can do.

We would love her to have a normal teenage life.

This Article is Compliments of SaneVax

NIH: Marketing HPV vaccines via censorship?#censor#censorship#Vaccines

By Norma Erickson

As an employee of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), it is certainly within Dr. Mark Schiffman’s job description to write articles promoting human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. After all, his employer owns patents on HPV vaccine production technologies and receives licensing fees from the sales of HPV vaccines.

The HPV vaccine, Gardasil, based largely on technology developed at NIH and produced by Merck & Co., was approved by the FDA in June 2006. As early as Feb 2007, an article was published in The NIH Record, titled, From Lab to Market: The HPV Vaccine proclaiming, “Perhaps no other recent product on the market demonstrates successful health care technology transfer better than the HPV vaccine.” What a great commercial success!

The NIH, funded by taxpayers, also maintains a forum for scientific discourse, called PubMed Commons which hopefully “will leverage the social power of the internet to encourage constructive criticism and high quality discussions of scientific issues that will both enhance understanding and provide new avenues of collaboration within the community”.

In December 2016, Dr. Schiffman and a few industry-paid consultants published an article titled “Carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection.”

January 19, 2017, the eminent pathologist Dr. Sin Hang Lee commented via PubMed Commons stating:

Schiffman and colleagues finally admitted in the end of the abstract that implementation of HPV vaccination and screening globally remains a challenge. However, the authors did not present the whole truth required for a balanced analysis.

It took nearly a month for Dr. Mark Schiffman to respond to Dr. Lee’s public comment with reassurances that the efficacy and safety profile of Gardasil had been well established.

Five days later, Dr. Lee responded to Dr. Schiffman saying:

Dr. Schiffman’s responses to my initial comment on the Primer needs rebuttal to point out its misleading and obfuscating statements.

Almost immediately, the discussion was effectively shut down by the removal of Dr. Lee’s comments. Does this not seem like a gross violation of the public trust in an organization such as NIH which has promised to ‘encourage constructive criticism and high quality discussions of scientific issues’?

Is it not a serious conflict of interest for NIH moderators to remove Dr. Sin Hang Lee’s dissenting comments from a site that is supposed to be promoting high quality scientific discussions?

The full text of the comment, response and rebuttal was downloaded before removal by one of the readers and can be read here.

Dr. Lee said he is discussing a very serious scientific medical issue. He did not find any inappropriate language in his comments or rebuttals.

Therefore, on behalf of thousands of families around the world dealing with serious new medical conditions after Gardasil administration, the SaneVax team requests that NIH moderators restore the original comment, response and rebuttal to the PubMed Commons’ website. It is in the public’s best interest that Dr. Schiffman and Dr. Lee continue their scientific debate.

Alternatively, the NIH moderators must publicly publish valid reasons for the removal of Dr. Lee’s comments.

In the words of Winston Churchill:

 In science you don’t need to be polite, you merely have to be right.

Open, honest debate is the only way to restore public confidence. Censorship will not work.

This Article is Compliments of SaneVax

NIH: Marketing HPV vaccines via censorship?