Gardasil: Reclaiming my life#iBelieve#Vaccines#HPV

With C-vitamin/Glutathione treatment protocol

By Anika Hjorth, Denmark

Gardasil changed our lives

This is the sequel to Gardasil changed my whole life.

I have been in treatment for six weeks now. The first three weeks I only got IV C-vitamin, starting at half dose (25.000 mg). Glutathione was also given IV in half dose to begin with (See protocol here).

September 11th – after 42 days of treatment – 11 IV C-vitamin and 3 IV glutathione

I have listed my symptoms before and after treatment. The treatment continues.

  • Extremely low blood pressure (down to 70/43). Only a few days in the beginning of the treatment, none since that time
  • Nausea. Stopped after 8 treatments with C-vitamin
  • Fluctuating heart rate. A few days in the beginning
  • Burning pain in the body. Still some pain in the legs – but getting better
  • Heartburn. Disappeared after 8 treatments with C-vitamins
  • Pressure in the chest, difficulties breathing – often in the evening/during the night. Had a severe event as the body could not take the high dose of C-vitamin. Then the dose was lowered and the symptom disappeared
  • Short of breath even when doing light exercise. Still a symptom – Is really getting better
  • Disturbance in short-time memory. No problems any longer
  • Pain in the stomach. No problems any longer
  • Lots of pain the legs and the soles of the foot. Still lots of pain
  • Loss of strength in the muscles
  • Heavy pain during menstruation and strong bleeding. Still very painful but reduction of bleeding
  • Disturbance of vision of left eye. Still some disturbance
  • Oppression in the ears. Not any longer
  • Lack of B3, d-vitamin and calcium. Do not know

After startup of treatment I have a better appetite and a stronger desire to live. The bubble I have been living in for 1½ years has disappeared – I have a huge surplus of energy….

Sequel to: Gardasil Changed My Whole Life

Tomorrow’s post goes into detail on Anika’s healing protocol. 

Thank you Anika, for sharing these details, and God Bless!!

French petition against HPV vaccines#iBelieve#ASD#Vaccines

Please sign the petition, no matter where you reside on the globe.  Place your country’s two letter abbreviation in front of the postal code, if you do not live in France.

By Norma Erickson

29 September 2014: IPSN, the Institute for the Protection of Natural Health (Institut pour la Protection de la Santé Naturelle), based in Brussels, in conjunction with French oncologist and surgeon Professor Henri Joyeux, launched a French petition against the HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix.

The petition is already doing quite well with over 316,000 signatures (and steadily rising) in a little over a week. Originally, the goal was to reach 500,000 signatures then submit the petition to government authorities in France. However, interest in this petition has expanded to other countries where medical professionals, scientists and medical consumers are also seriously questioning the sanity of universal HPV vaccination programs.

HPV vaccines are an issue without borders

Due to so many requests from people outside France who wished to sign the petition, Professor Joyeux and the Institute for the Protection of Natural Health have agreed to open their petition to every country in the world. Please consider demonstrating your solidarity with the people of France by adding your signature to this petition.

If you have already decided HPV vaccines are of questionable value please sign the petition here.

You need only fill in 4 boxes:  your first name, last name, postal code (if you do not live in France, please add the two letter abbreviation for your country before the postal code, eg. GB for the UK, DE for Germany, US for the United States, etc…) and your email address.

The boxes to tick after that are to indicate: 1) whether you want to be kept informed (in French of course) of petition progress and 2) whether you would like information (in French) on natural health. Once you have done this, simply click on the green box to submit your signature.

If you have not decided please read the text of  the video by Professor Joyeux:

The organizers of this petition understand that HPV vaccines have not been proven to be safe, affordable, necessary or effective. Professor Joyeux explains exactly why in the video text below. The video is in French and can be accessed at the end of this article. Helen Kimball-Brooke has kindly provided the English translation of the content.

Video Content:

Good morning.  This is Professor Henri Joyeux, French oncologist and surgeon.  I am writing to you because the French High Council for Public Health has recently published a report recommending first of all:

  • that there be widespread administration of the HPV (Human Papillomavirus) vaccine in French schools, in an attempt to fight cervical cancer and other sexually-transmitted diseases (STDs), and also
  • that the starting age for vaccination of both girls and little boys be lowered to 9.

However, just like any medicine prescribed to a person in good health and even more so to children, the two current HPV vaccines, Gardasil® and Cervarix® bring with them the risk of serious adverse effects.

In addition, the authorities fail to mention to us that the protection against cervical cancer conferred by these vaccines is not 100%.  In fact, protection from Gardasil® and Cervarix® is no more than 70%, leaving 30% risk of cancer.

Even if we could be certain of their effectiveness, these anti-viral vaccines should really only be administered to high-risk populations.

The HPV virus is transmitted primarily through sexual relations.  Do not allow the authorities to apply an inappropriate health measure to your children!

Sign our petition demanding a moratorium on these vaccines which should not be imposed in our schools without providing prior comprehensive and transparent information to the parents.

There are very good reasons to be deeply concerned about this campaign.  According to Professor Guy Vallancien (a supporter of this vaccine), urologist, head of department at the Institut Montsouris in Paris and member of the French National Academy of Medicine,

“Analysis of the pharmacovigilance data for this vaccine revealed 26,675 serious adverse effects, 113 of which were cases of multiple sclerosis.  In France alone, 435 cases of serious adverse effects, including 135 autoimmune diseases, 15 of which were cases of multiple sclerosis, have been reported to the national network of regional pharmacovigilance centres and the vaccine manufacturer.”

http://sante2020.blog.lemonde.fr/2014/04/01/gardasil-nous-revoila/

Many of these young schoolgirls, now disabled for life, were unnecessarily vaccinated with Gardasil when they were not in any way part of the high-risk population.

Sign the petition to protect your child from the same fate.

In Austria, following the death of a young woman vaccinated with Gardasil, a report was published indicating that the long-term effectiveness of such a vaccination would be “totally negligible”.  The Austrian Health Minister, Dr. Andrea Kdolsky, then decided to withdraw HPV vaccines from the official schedule, to stop reimbursing them and to encourage regular Pap smear screening instead.

On the 24th of January 2008, the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) announced that some women previously vaccinated with Gardasil had died.  It is therefore beyond imprudent to want to vaccinate all children, across the board, against HPV: it is totally irresponsible.

Sign our petition urgently.

As early as February 2007, interviews aired on American television reported serious complications, told the tragic stories of living Gardasil victims and showed photos of young women who had died following vaccination with Gardasil.

In 2013, the Japanese authorities decided to stop recommending this vaccine.

In France, a lawsuit was filed against Sanofi, the manufacturer of the vaccine, by young Océane Bourguignon and other young girls.  They all suffered extremely serious brain and spinal cord damage after being vaccinated with Gardasil.

“We do not yet know its effectiveness.  We do not yet know the risks” warned Dr. Jean-Paul Hamon, chair of the French Doctors Association, on French TV channel TF1.

Video clip: “We do not yet know its effectiveness.  We do not yet know the risks.  The only safe and effective method is Pap smear screening.  And now we prefer to invest €300M into something whose effectiveness and risks we don’t yet know.”

This is 100% true.  If you or your child think that you may be infected with HPV, go to your doctor and get a smear test.  If precancerous lesions are found, they can definitely be treated.  But above all, no vaccine!  It could even increase your risks of getting cancer.

Two analyses of the vaccine’s impact on women already infected with HPV before they were vaccinated revealed an increase in the number of high-grade precancerous cervical lesions in the Gardasil® group compared with the unvaccinated placebo group.  Fortunately, the difference was not significant but this proves that in any case, the vaccine is useless if you are already infected, which is not surprising.

The worst however is that the long-term effectiveness of the vaccine, even in persons not infected at the time of vaccination, is unknown.  The French High Health Authority itself writes as follows on Gardasil®:

“The effectiveness of HPV vaccination on the incidence of cancerous lesions in the genital area can only be established retrospectively after a number of years because these pathologies develop very slowly.”

Do you want your children to be Guinea pigs?  It is therefore totally premature and potentially dangerous to impose a widespread vaccination campaign in French schools, especially when the recipients are young and very vulnerable children.

This is what the experts are saying: Abby Lippman, epidemiologist at McGill University in Canada and specialist in women’s health:

“Neither Gardasil® nor its competitor Cervarix® has yet demonstrated its effectiveness in preventing cervical cancer.  According to these specialists, “we do not yet know if the vaccine will result in a reduction in the number of cancer cases.”

According to Lucija Tomljenovic, research scientist working on the neurotoxic effects of vaccine adjuvants at the University of British Columbia in Canada,

“The vaccine is no more effective than other methods of prevention but carries far greater risks.”

Not only can it cause accidents but widespread vaccination of young girls may result in a drop in Pap smear screening which we know can save lives.  Certain women will think “I am vaccinated, I am protected” which is in fact scientifically false.

This is why in March 2014, more than 700 French doctors signed a petition demanding a Parliamentary Committee of Enquiry into this vaccine.  One of them was pulmonologist Dr. Irène Frachon, courageous revealer of the Mediator scandal.  These doctors have already instilled fear in the government.

Now it is families who are trembling with fear for their children.  It is now our turn to triumph by making this message go viral and gathering millions of grassroots signatures on this petition.

Of course the Big Pharma lobbies will put up a serious fight.  We know them well with their enormous advertising resources.  France represents a massive market for them every year.  The vaccine manufacturers will pull out all the stops to make us think that their products are safe… grinning all the way to the bank.

But our children’s lives are worth more than their profits!

Why should your children run even the slightest risk when this disease is easily detectable and curable with regular screening by a gynecologist?  They shouldn’t!

With the Institut pour la Protection de la Santé Naturelle (Institute for the Protection of Natural Health), we can be millions to say NO TO THESE VACCINES in our schools, NO to vaccinating 9-year-old children with a product which may not be effective and is potentially dangerous, even deadly.

If millions of us sign, the authorities won’t be able to ignore us, but to reach this figure, each of us must sign this petition immediately and circulate this appeal as far and as wide as possible.

Dr. Bérangère Arnal, OB-GYN and mother of 13-year-old Eve, has stated that her daughter will not receive the HPV vaccine but will be informed and regularly screened if necessary.  This is the advice I give to all families.

In high-risk populations, regular Pap smear tests every three years has resulted in a 70% reduction in the cervical cancer mortality rate, but this information is concealed from the general public.

The (of course very profitable) target of the lobbies is to vaccinate all schoolgirls before then vaccinating young boys of the same age, as soon as possible, and to make the vaccination mandatory in French schools.

We do not agree with these objectives which we deem to be “false public health”.  We can make them withdraw this plan by saying NO to this abuse, along with millions of others.  But to achieve this, every responsible French citizen must circulate this petition as far and as wide as possible.  I am therefore counting on all of you to sign the petition and to send it as soon as possible to all of your contacts.

Thank you from the bottom of my heart, in the name of our children’s health.

Professor Henri Joyeux.

Sign the petition by clicking on this link

Institut Pour La Protection de la Santé Naturelle

The right to alternative treatment

NO to widespread vaccination of children against HPV

Petition

For the attention of
The President of the French Republic,
The French Minister of Health and Social Affairs,
And the French Minister of National Education 

Mr. President, Mme Health and Social Affairs Minister, Mme. National Education Minister,

On the 15th of September 2014, the French High Council for Public Health published a statement recommending that:

  • HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccination should be introduced in French schools in an attempt to prevent cervical cancer and other sexually-transmitted diseases;
  • If necessary, the starting age for vaccination of both young girls and young boys would be lowered to 9.

This plan has aroused very deep concern in the French people and the medical profession.

There are a very large number of us who fear that our schools are being used as a front for a widespread HPV vaccination campaign targeting our children, without providing families transparent information on the effectiveness and risks of this vaccine and without allowing them to consider the pros and cons.

May we remind you that the analysis of pharmacovigilance data revealed 26,675 cases of serious adverse effects connected with these vaccines, including 113 cases of multiple sclerosis.

May we also remind you that the only method which has been proven to prevent cervical cancer is the Pap smear.  If precancerous lesions are found, they can then be treated.

The vaccine however does not confer 100% protection, far from it.  All medical sources concur on this point.  It is a very dangerous situation if vaccinated individuals go off thinking that they are fully protected.

We the undersigned therefore demand that the plan for widespread HPV vaccination in French schools be stopped:

  • Until reasonable vaccine effectiveness has been proven;
  • Until we are aware of and can control all the adverse effects of these vaccines;
  • Until we can be assured that such widespread vaccination will not cause a drop in Pap smear screening, the only proven method of preventing cervical cancer.

This is the only way to protect a large number of children from unnecessary accidents and considerable suffering.  You will also be making a step towards maintaining the trust of parents and keeping necessary peace in our schools.

Yours sincerely,

Number of Signatures

 

References: 

(1) http://sante2020.blog.lemonde.fr/2014/04/01/gardasil-nous-revoila/
(2) http://lci.tf1.fr/science/sante/papillomavirus-un-vaccin-des-neuf-ans-a-l-ecole-pour-les-jeunes-8485665.html
(3) http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_1710328/fr/rappel-dinformation-sur-la-vaccination-contre-les-papillomavirus-humains-par-le-gardasil

This article in it’s entirety, is complements of www.SaneVax.org

www.sanevax.org

Free the innocent#iBelieve#repost#tmom

Just as in many posts before, I have been pondering over some thoughts that have been coming to mind.  I have felt at a bit of a loss as to what justice I can do for these concerns.

As I have spent countless hours researching, I have been stunned at how vast an issue this is.

I am speaking of the Many parents, and foster parents, and others that are innocently imprisoned every year.  They are wrongly accused for harming or murdering a baby or child.  I cannot imagine a worse assault  to one’s character.  These assaults happen to innocent people, on a regular basis, and they stretch world-wide.

How does this happen to these innocent people?  It happens right under our noses in our own communities, because we put our faith in man.  The supposed scientific research that doctors, and nurses tell the local law enforcement, and the forthcoming pleas from these parents fall on deaf ears.

Can you imagine having your child seizure, have a fatal allergic reaction, incur brain swelling, and then be accused of murder, and sent to prison.  This is what happens, and now you can grieve their loss, and have your support system torn away, and sit alone in a cell.

The research that is used is old, and faulty, and now there are talk shows that receive dollars to dramatize the events of a shaken baby.

Interestingly, the modern evidence reveals that a shaken baby cannot receive the injuries that are accepted by law enforcement in these cases.  Many individuals are innocent along the way.  Trusting the Superior advice of a physician.

Well, let’s not be in the dark any longer.  There are those that have research, and know how these injuries take place, but it is covered up because of the tie to vaccines, and probably other prescriptions as well. How often do these injuries take place within 30 days of a vaccination?

If your child were to have these reactions in front of the doctor, then another description would be said, one being: unknown cause. 

Silly isn’t it, let’s call it what it is.  Every parent, babysitter, boyfriend, girlfriend, nanny, grandparent or foster parent that is caring for a child following a vaccination is at risk of being accused of shaken baby syndrome, if that child has a similar reaction above, and no one else is there to witness it. These are the extremes that pharmaceutical companies will go to protect their investments.

It makes me sick that there are individuals that walk this earth, and will hurt others to this extent, including the life of the child, just for monetary gain. 

Everyday, day in and day out, our fellow man sits, and waits to be heard, and rescued.

Let’s remember the Golden Rule, and do unto others as we would have them do unto you.

Let’s be wise to this, and do all we can to free the innocent.

 

 

 

Questions Surrounding Review of Challenged Vaccine-Autism Study#Vaccines#iBelieve#A.S.D.

by  

Did the medical journal Pediatrics stand by a questioned vaccine-autism study without interviewing the coauthor who confessed to and exposed alleged scientific misconduct?

If so, that would deviate from what should be standard procedure in such an investigation, according to internationally recognized medical ethicist Dr. Michael Carome.“If the evidence seems substantial, the journal should contact all co-authors, present them with the allegations and supporting evidence, and ask them to respond,” says Carome, a research ethics expert who heads the Health Research Group at the watchdog group Public Citizen.Last month, William Thompson, a senior scientist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stepped forward to say that he and his CDC coauthors omitted key data showing a link between MMR vaccine and autism in African American children. The study was published in 2004 in the journalPediatrics.“I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information,” said Thompson…

 Read the Entire Article Here

I have found this investigative reporter’s work to be insightful, and direct.  A fellow seeker of truth.  Worth the time to review the posts.

sharylattkisson.com

How to determine the value of a vaccine#IBelieve#Family#Vaccines

By Sandy Lunoe

International health authorities use enormous resources to promote every new vaccine developed as providing nothing but benefits for the average medical consumer and society as a whole.  Efforts are focused on increasing uptake of various vaccines. However, there are serious considerations which should be adequately addressed prior to the issue of vaccine uptake.

Just imagine what would happen to a family’s budget if they bought a new car and ignored the fact that it got half the gas mileage of their current vehicle. If the family finances were already pushed to the limit, this could be disastrous.

Despite the fact healthcare budgets around the world are strained to the breaking point, a recent study, Valuing vaccination,” edited by Novartis vaccines decidedly promotes vaccines and even more extensive vaccination.

This paper basically outlines how to improve the PR campaign for universal vaccination programs. Positive cost/benefit issues are presented without reservation.

However, there are numerous details omitted from this paper which must be taken into account in order to determine the true cost/benefit ratio for any vaccine prior to including it in a national vaccination program.

SaneVax Inc. maintains four common sense criteria must be met prior to the introduction of any vaccine: The vaccine should be proven Safe, Affordable, Necessary and Effective.

Following are some issues which must be closely examined in order to accurately determine any vaccine’s value to any given country. They are at least as important as vaccine uptake, if not more so.

SAFE

  • What serious adverse reactions are anticipated with the vaccine? What subset of the population is most susceptible?
  • Long term adverse reactions include autoimmune conditions of which there are more than a hundred. What subset of the population is most susceptible to autoimmune disorders with the vaccine?
  • How many fatalities are expected per 100,000 injections of this vaccine?
  • What are the potential consequences of interactions between ingredients in this vaccine and ingredients of other vaccines that may be administered at the same time?
  • What are the potential consequences of synergistic toxicity due to administration of several substances and/or several doses of the same substances?
  • Are there any ingredients in the vaccine that increase the permeability of the blood-brain barrier with potentially detrimental consequences including brain damage?
  • Is this vaccine vial stopper made of latex/rubber? If so, what percentage of the population is susceptible to allergic reactions because of the packaging?
  • What percentage of our population is likely to be susceptible to allergic reactions to this vaccine’s ingredients?
  • Does this vaccine contain any ingredients that are known to impair fertility? Suspected of impairing fertility?
  • Has this vaccine been tested for the potential to cause genetic mutations?
  • Does this vaccine contain any foreign DNA? If so, what are the potential consequences of injecting this material?
  • Are there any genetically engineered components in this vaccine? If so, what are the potential detrimental health consequences including cancers regarding injection of these recombinant ingredients?
  • Has this vaccine been tested for the potential to cause cancer?
  • Has this vaccine been tested for safety in pregnant women?
  • What are the odds of the bacteria or virus targeted in this vaccine being replaced by another more virulent strain?

Affordable

  • What is the current cost of treating those who contract the disease targeted by this vaccine versus the cost of vaccinating the population susceptible to contracting it?
  • What is the anticipated cost to the vaccine injured for loss of social network, activities, education and prospects of employment?
  • What is the anticipated cost to parents and caregivers for anticipated vaccine injuries?
  • What is the anticipated cost of medications and treatments for the vaccine injured?
  • What is the anticipated cost to society for loss of paid work, mental and physical burdens, loss of productivity, etc… due to either injuries or family members caring for the injured?
  • What is the cost to the community and tax payers for treatment and care of the injured?
  • Would the money spent on this vaccine be more wisely used by investing in other areas of healthcare?

Necessary

  • How prevalent is the disease targeted by this vaccine?
  • Does the risk of contracting this disease justify a mass vaccination program?
  • What other preventive measures are available for this disease?
  • What treatments are currently available for this disease?
  • What risks are involved with using the currently available treatments?
  • What are the long and short term health consequences of contracting the targeted disease?
  • What percentage of those who contract this disease will face long term health consequences?

Effective

  • How many people need to use this vaccine in order to avoid each case of the targeted disease?
  • Out of each 100 people vaccinated, how many will be protected from contracting the disease?
  • How long will this protection last? Is the need for boosters anticipated?
  • Does this vaccine target the genotype of bacteria/virus prevalent in our country?
  • What is the possibility of the vaccine targeted bacteria/virus mutating in response to being suppressed?
  • What are the chances of the bacteria/virus targeted by this vaccine being replaced by a more virulent type as a result of suppressing the original one?
  • What storage and transportation requirements exist to maintain the original efficacy of this vaccine?

As you can clearly see, there are many questions which must be answered in order to determine whether or not any particular vaccine has enough value to be added to a national immunization program.

Only after the answers are provided, should vaccine uptake become an issue.

“If people let Government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.” (Thomas Jefferson)

SaneVax.org

AAVP asks Spanish Health Ministry to Ban HPV Vaccines#HPV#Vaccines#CDCchat

AAVP letterheadAAVP meets Spanish Health Ministry representatives to ask for the withdrawal of HPV vaccines from the Official vaccination schedule of Spain and informs there are three cases of suspected death and numerous cases of suspected serious adverse reactions in our country and around the world.

Last Tuesday the 26th of August, Spanish Health Ministry representatives and Alicia Capilla, President of AAVP (Association of people affected by HPV vaccine) together with Francisco Almódovar (attorney from the firm Almódovar&Jara) held an important meeting  with three representatives of the team of  Mrs. Mercedes Vinuesa, General Director  of Public Health in the quarters of the Spanish Health Ministry.

AAV President, Alicia Capilla

Alicia Capilla stated that Spanish Health Authorities have not been responsible because families did not receive information prior to vaccination about the risks their daughters have suffered after receiving the HPV vaccine, thus the right we have as citizens to have therapeutic informed consent has been violated.

Besides, the health care for the victims of papillomavirus vaccine damage has been inadequate since 2009 when the first serious reactions began to occur.

Mrs. Capilla stated that Spanish Health Authorities have not recognized the adverse reactions – most of them serious- that affected girls suffered after receiving the HPV vaccine, even though the reactions they suffered are registered in the product leaflet and in numerous similar reports to the Spanish and European databases. That is incomprehensible and a big contradiction.

Why don´t Health Authorities want to recognize these events when they are reported in the product information leaflet and corroborated by thousands of reports around the world?

In Spain, there are 737 reports of suspected adverse reactions (until January 2012) and three suspected cases of death. We have asked Health Authorities to give us an update on the number of adverse reactions reported since 2012 and they have not given us this information.

Why don´t they want to give us this information if that is a matter of transparency of Public Health and they support the idea that the vaccine is safe?

In Europe the number of reports of suspected adverse reactions is also huge. In a survey done by AAVP there are more than 150 reports that ended in death and 11,814 serious reports.

According to the French Committee of Pharmacovigilance, since its marketing in 2006, there are 2092 cases (representing 5850 adverse reactions) including 503 serious cases. The report of the French Committee presents also International data, with 160,538 adverse reactions, 26,675 are serious. In VAERS (American System of reports of side effects after vaccination) the data is also alarming, there are 35,270 reports altogether, more than 150 reports of suspected deaths and 4920 serious events, taking into account that less than 10% of adverse reactions are reported in the U.S., this figure must be much higher.

It is very important to note that most adverse reactions reported after HPV vaccinations around the world are neurological disorders. Taking into account all this data, we have requested the Health Ministry to investigate seriously the efficacy of this vaccine.

Alicia Capilla stated that so much nonsense cannot be justified by ignorance as our daughters have not been the unique girls, not even the first ones who have suffered side effects after the vaccination. We believe it is an insult to human intelligence to state they are all coincidental or psychological problems because most of these reactions are already listed in the leaflet of the vaccines.

It is obvious: when different people, in different parts of the world, at different times react to a drug/vaccine in the same way, as is the case with HPV vaccines – something has to be wrong with the product in question – particularly when the Ministry has recognized this vaccine, like any medicine, causes adverse effects.

AAVP believes that Health Authorities should change their strategy. Not acknowledging the existence of adverse reactions makes investigation impossible. For that reason, we believe the number of reactions will be higher and higher and the problem will be bigger and bigger. This is not acceptable.

For that reason we have asked the Spanish Health Ministry to follow a Protocol in which they:

  • Recognize the adverse reactions (most of which are already registered in the leaflet of the product, the databases of European  Countries, EEUU and scientific literature) and the status of victims of the HPV vaccine.
  • Give adequate health care to affected people, who trusted in Public Health when they decided to vaccinate.
  • Create a Compensation Fund for damage from vaccines as it exists in other countries like USA and France.
  • Scientifically investigate all deaths and RAMs after HPV vaccine administration.
  • Sponsor scientific debates in Spain similar to those in other countries such as France and Japan.
  • Conduct an accurate and updated study of the reports of suspected adverse reactions in our country in which the most common RAMs should be studied and the incidence of suffering an adverse reaction estimated.
  • Re-evaluate the benefit-risk of HPV vaccines and stop the inclusion of, and funding for, this vaccine in the National Health System of our country, since it seems –according to international and national scientific bibliography that:
    • HPV vaccines are not safe – taking into account the huge numbers of suspected deaths and serious reports and the fact that the vaccines contain  viral DNA which can be harmful for human beings-
    • They are not effective – they only target two or four serotypes (depending if it is Gardasil® or Cervarix® the two vaccines in the market). We need at least 20 or 25 years to check if women who were vaccinated developed more or less cases of cervical cancer in relation to non- vaccinated women.
    • HPV vaccines are not necessary – there are other harmless methods of prevention such as cytology that does not cause harm to women, and must be done even if they have been vaccinated because HPV vaccines do not target all carcinogenic serotypes.

Furthermore in this re-evaluation Health Authorities should take into account that:

  • This vaccine is given to healthy young women.
  • Spain is a country with a low incidence and mortality from cervical cancer.
  • The vaccine is not effective against all carcinogenic serotypes.
  • Nobody knows the duration of immunity of HPV vaccines or whether young women will need more boosters in the future.
  • There is no justification for exposing healthy young women to unnecessary risks of serious health problems when there are other preventive methods available, such as the cytology, that do not cause any harm.

Officials who participated in the meeting, led by the Director General of Public Health, Mercedes Vinuesa recognize that they must strengthen information provided to citizens and health professionals about the benefits and risks of the HPV and improve the informed consent prior to administration of HPV vaccines.

If anything has become clear during this meeting, it is that in the case of HPV vaccinations the Spanish healthcare system failed to provide adequate information prior to HPV vaccinations and failed to provide adequate health care for those adversely affected by those vaccinations.

Therefore, the Health Ministry has agreed to study the cases of young affected girls, follow their paths, and hold another meeting with AAVP in two weeks’ time to provide answers to AAVP´s requests.

www.sanevax.org

12-year-old Girl Dies Hours After She is Injected with HPV Vaccine#HPV#Vaccines#iBelieve

by Jeffry John Aufderheide 

The family of a 12-year-old girl from Wisconsin who died hours after receiving an HPV vaccine is grieving the loss of their daughter. Meredith Prohaska, described as being an extremely active and healthy girl, passed away on July 30th. [1]

According to a news report, Meredith’s mother took her to the doctor for a sore throat. At the doctor appointment, she received the HPV vaccine. Later in the afternoon, the mother found her daughter unresponsive on the floor, and she was later pronounced dead at the hospital. The parents suspect the vaccine as the primary cause of their daughter’s death. However, Meredith’s autopsy report rules her cause of death as inconclusive. [2]

Medical dogma is immune to “new insights,” especially when it comes from a parent on this topic, specifically. Many families also share Meredith’s story; the pain and emotional suffering is all too familiar…

Read the Entire Article Here

vactruth.com

I do not think that this little girl would be happy about her parent’s being smoke screened about her cause of death.  The actions of the medical personnel and government organizations who have attempted to minimize, and deceive the parent’s are disgraceful, and the lowest of the low. I look forward to the day that these tragedies are a thing of the past.

I am so sorry for the parent’s loss, and I hope they are comforted through this time.