Tag: VAERS reports

Breaking News: EMA investigating HPV vaccines#android#iPad#retweet

jlvranes Leave a comment

By Norma Erickson

Sunday, July 12th Svenska Dagbladet (a Swedish newspaper) released a story giving hope to hundreds of Danish families whose lives turned upside-down when their daughters began to experience multiple new medical conditions after HPV vaccine injections. This newspaper announced the European Medicines Agency (EMA) was launching a probe into possible side effects of the highly controversial HPV vaccines. Finally, these families believed they might get some answers as to why their daughters had transformed from healthy athletic girls to mere shadows of their former selves.

The Svenska Dagbladet article went on to state:

For years, talk of possible risks and side effects from HPV vaccines was rejected by authorities, doctors and drug companies. The decision by EMA in London, which is to be presented on Monday, according to SvD’s sources, is therefore likely to create harsh reactions.

Within a few short hours, the story was confirmed by multiple other news outlets.

A Medscape article stated the EMA had started a review on human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines to ”further clarify aspects of their safety profile,” although the agency also points out that this review ’does not question that the benefits of HPV vaccines outweigh their risks.” This report also noted that the EMA would make no recommended changes in the use of HPV vaccines while the review was being conducted.

An ABC News article reported,

The European Medicines Agency says it has started a review of cervical cancer vaccines to see if they are linked to two rare conditions, but emphasized it hasn’t changed its recommendations for how the shots should be used.

An article in The Local, from Denmark stated:

At the request of Denmark, which has seen an increasing number of young girls suffer side effects, the European Medicines Agency said on Monday that it will take a closer look at the HPV vaccine.

The review is being carried out by EMA’s own side effects committee, PRAC, which according to Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet has had internal disagreements over how to handle mounting suspected evidence of medical risks connected to the vaccines.

The Daily Mail (UK) article reported:

The safety of the HPV vaccine has today been thrown into doubt as health experts launch a review of the jab amid concerns over its side-effects.

The European Medicines Agency’s probe will focus on rare reports of two conditions, complex regional pain syndrome and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome

The EMA was quick to note the review does not question that the benefits of HPV vaccines outweigh the risks.

Suddenly, parents around the world began to experience the same kind of hope those in Denmark did. Someone was finally going to listen to what they had been saying for months, sometimes years. Instead of brushing off their daughters’ (and sons’) new symptoms as psychosomatic, their children’s new medical conditions would be examined as possible side effects of the HPV vaccines they all had taken.

This 3 minute Danish news report (with English subtitles) gives an indication of how much families around the world are depending on the outcome of a serious scientific investigation.

Do these parents finally have a reason to be hopeful; or is the light they see at the end of the tunnel an oncoming train?”

What kind of ‘probe’ is the EMA going to conduct?

The documentation provided by the European Medicines Agency regarding this investigation raises many questions about the voracity of their efforts. Let’s start by taking a critical look at the press release distributed by the EMA on July 13th regarding this review.

The first two paragraphs of this press release state:

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has started a review of HPV vaccines to further clarify aspects of their safety profile. These vaccines have been used in around 72 million people worldwide and their use is expected to prevent many cases of cervical cancer (cancer of the neck of the womb) and various other cancers and conditions caused by HPV. Cervical cancer is the 4th most common cause of cancer death in women worldwide, with tens of thousands of deaths in Europe each year despite the existence of screening programmes to identify the cancer early. The review does not question that the benefits of HPV vaccines outweigh their risks.

As for all licensed medicines the safety of these vaccines is monitored by the Agency’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC).

The following statements from the EMA press release are not strictly accurate:

  • Statement: These vaccines have been used in around 72 million people worldwide.
  • Fact: No one knows how many people have been injected with HPV vaccines because the vast majority of countries do not record administered doses. At any given time, many of the distributed doses they do keep track of may be in storage awaiting administration.
  • Statement: Their use is expected to prevent many cases of cervical cancer…
  • Fact: Note they use the words ‘expected to’ NOT ‘proven to’.
  • Statement: Cervical cancer is the 4th most common cause of cancer death in women worldwide,
  • Fact: No mention is made of the fact that over 80% of these cancer deaths occur in low to middle income countries, NOT the European Union.
  • Statement: …with tens of thousands of deaths in Europe each year, despite the existence of screening programmes to identify the cancer early.
  • Fact: There may be ‘tens of thousands’ in Europe, but for the European Union the cervical cancer mortality rate is 3.7/100,000 – MUCH lower than the rate of serious adverse events being reported worldwide after HPV vaccinations. Denmark for instance currently reports serious adverse events at a rate of 200/100,000 injected.

This is not exactly a good start if one wants to instill public confidence in the outcome of a safety investigation. How can one trust the outcome of an investigation being conducted by an agency that has so little regard for accuracy in their press releases?

Let’s move on to the additional announcement issued by the EMA on the same date which states:

The current review will look at available data with a focus on rare reports of two conditions: complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS, a chronic pain condition affecting the limbs) and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS, a condition where the heart rate increases abnormally after sitting or standing up, causing symptoms such as dizziness and fainting, as well as headache, chest pain and weakness). Reports of these conditions in young women who have received an HPV vaccine have been previously considered during routine safety monitoring by the PRAC but a causal link between them and the vaccines was not established.

Both conditions can occur in non-vaccinated individuals and it is considered important to further review if the number of cases reported with HPV vaccine is greater than would be expected.

In its review the PRAC will consider the latest scientific knowledge, including any research that could help clarify the frequency of CRPS and POTS following vaccination or identify any causal link.

This section raises several questions in the mind of even the most casual observer.

  • How can they say these two conditions are rare before the investigation is completed?
  • Since the two conditions have been considered previously, have any communications been issued to medical professionals alerting them to watch for these conditions after HPV vaccines?
  • Why are they only looking at the frequency of CPRS/POTS following vaccination?
  • How can an ”expected rate” be determined without examining the frequency of CPRS/POTS in unvaccinated people of the same age group as those receiving HPV vaccines?
  • Since CPRS/POTS are just now being considered as a potential adverse reaction to HPV vaccines, how can evidence of a potential causal link possibly have been established?

Why were POTS and CRPS chosen for this investigation?

If one wanted to get into a truly serious discussion, they would ask why two rare, difficult to diagnose conditions were chosen to be examined instead of looking at all of the serious symptoms recipients of HPV vaccines are reporting. Is it because the symptoms of both are commonly seen in many other disorders making these two conditions difficult to diagnose?

As a matter of fact, the currently used diagnostic criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CPRS) was only published in 2007. Even that set of diagnostic criteria is under review for proposed changes. How is the average medical professional supposed to make an accurate diagnosis of this disorder when the experts can’t agree on how to do so?

The same is true of POTS diagnostic criteria. Post orthostatic tachycardia syndrome is not a disease, but simply a cluster of symptoms that are frequently seen together. Since POTS is not a disease, it is fair to say that POTS is caused by something else. However, figuring out what is causing the symptoms of POTS in each patient can be very difficult, and in many cases, patients and their doctors will not be able to determine the precise underlying cause. This makes it pretty convenient for the stakeholders, wouldn’t you say?

Quite frequently people live with these two conditions for years without receiving an accurate diagnosis. Could that be the reason the EMA chose these two disorders to examine?

These facts make it relatively easy to keep the number of reports low, particularly when quoting the rates against distributed doses instead of administered doses.

Where does that leave all of the HPV vaccine recipients who currently exhibit the symptoms of these two disorders but have not obtained a diagnosis yet?

Unreported with no diagnosis and consequently no treatment protocol!

Who does the EMA turn to in order to investigate these potential safety concerns?

Believe it, or not – In order to examine potential safety concerns with Gardasil/Silgard, Gardasil 9 and Cervarix the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) is going to question the Marketing Authorization Holders (MAH’s). The Marketing authorisation holders for these products are GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited, and Sanofi Pasteur MSD.

How insane can one get? These are the very organizations which stand to lose the most should a safety issue be proven regarding HPV vaccines. Does anyone in their right mind think these organizations are going to be transparent when it comes to anything that could substantially effect their bottom line?

The EMA did mention examining data, but will this data come from anyone outside the marketing authorization holders’ control?

Why did the PRAC make no mention of efforts to interview the families of those affected?

Why are they making no apparent effort to talk to physicians on the ground – the people most likely to have experience observing new medical conditions after HPV vaccine administration?

Is the PRAC going to extend their probe to include examination of peer-reviewed publications indicating possible safety concerns surrounding HPV vaccines? Better yet, how about talking to the authors of these publications?

So, what hope do thousands of affected families have?

In this particular instance, there is a great deal of hope. The EMA may have been able to conduct their investigations like this in the past. This time it will not work.

Parents of those with new medical conditions after HPV vaccine administration are not isolated and alone. They have united around the world. They do not want further clarification – they want the truth. They are watching.

Medical and scientific professionals with genuine concerns about the safety, efficacy and need for HPV vaccinations are speaking out. They are willing fight to protect the health of future generations. They are watching.

Business as usual will no longer suffice. Medical consumers around the world will accept nothing less than open, honest scientific investigations regarding HPV vaccine issues.

The families of those negatively affected by HPV vaccine use will not surrender until their children’s health issues have been properly investigated, successful treatment protocols have been designed, and mechanisms put in place to guarantee this type of medical experimentation never gets out of hand again.

Citizens of the world will no longer stand back and allow government health officials to betray the public trust!

Read this article in Spanish here.

Sources:

This article in it’s entirety, is compliments of www.SaneVax.org

Pro-HPV Vaccine Doc Omits Financial Ties in Medical Journal#android#iPad#retweet

jlvranes Leave a comment

by

One of the biggest promoted drugs in history, the HPV cervical cancer vaccine, is a multi-billion dollar blockbuster. But it’s also faced criticism — some of it from a scientist who helped develop it —  amid concerns about safety and effectiveness

When Japan suspended proactively recommending the vaccine amid concerns over injuries, the makers, Merck (Gardasil) and GlaxoSmithKline (Cevarix), began the hard lobby.

Enter a physician who wrote a correspondence about the controversy…

Continue to the Post Here

https://sharylattkisson.com

 

HPV vaccine has done this to my child.#android#iPad#retweet

jlvranes Leave a comment

This was a very hard video to post, my 12 yr old daughter was fine before her vaccine, now this is her life. We live in New Zealand and I thought our healthcare system was ok, we have been left to deal with this ourselves. I’m showing this because I want people to know what damage this vaccine can and does cause. Please research before deciding. I didn’t 🙁 sorry the audio wasn’t the best, what I’m saying is “I’ve just carried Briar out of the bath as her legs keep collapsing, this is the amount of pain she is in after pain killers, that her pain feels like a ‘big knife’ in her legs, just over a year ago she could do all this, have a bath, play sport, just basically have a life, then the HPV vaccine happened and she can’t do a thing, this is her life and this is the part nobody sees. I didn’t want to cause her more pain but I wanted to show what her life is now.” …

Breaking News: Vaccine Tragedy in Mexico#android#iPad#retweet

jlvranes Leave a comment

By Mario Lamo-Jiménez, Guest Author

May 8, 2015: The indigenous municipality of Simojovel, in the state of Chiapas, Mexico reported the death of two babies after the administration of vaccines against hepatitis B (HepB), tuberculosis (BCG), and rotavirus.

Within hours of receiving the vaccines, 37 babies out of a total of 52 vaccinated had adverse reactions; some began to convulse with the tragic result of two dead and 37 hospitalized, 13 of whom reported to be in critical condition.

According to the Catholic organization Pueblo Creyente, the dead included a 30-day-old girl and a 28-day-old boy.

The Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS) ordered the preventive suspension of the BCG (Tuberculosis), Rotavirus and Hepatitis B vaccine, after what they suspect were allergic reactions to the vaccines administered to the minors in Chiapas.

Although this news has been widely disseminated in the Spanish-language press, it has been virtually ignored by the English-language press.

What is wrong with this picture?

A recent outbreak of measles originating in Disneyland with no fatalities received world-wide media coverage and calls for legislation resulting in a heated battle regarding public vaccination policies.

A vaccination incident in Mexico which negatively impacted nearly 80% of the recipients, resulting in two deaths, 37 hospitalizations and 13 babies fighting for their lives has not been reported to the community at large and is certainly not being reported in other countries, particularly the United States.

Is this lack of media coverage because vaccines are promoted as “safe and effective” and no one wants to tarnish that image?

Is the lack of media coverage because it would negatively impact efforts to make vaccines mandatory and affect the profits of vaccine manufacturers and various other stakeholders?

It is crucial that the international community be informed of these deaths and of the fact that these vaccines have as of now been suspended in Mexico. It is an essential part of the universal right to informed consent.

Mothers in Simojevel are now asking themselves how safe these vaccines can be if they can kill perfectly healthy children within hours, and also leave many more in a very precarious health condition.

The municipality if Simojevel has historically been besieged by drug traffickers with their religious leaders have received death threats. It seems the only state intervention so far has been to promote these vaccinations, with the reported catastrophic results.

When will human lives become more important than vaccine uptake?

Read this article in Spanish here.

Sources:

https://www.facebook.com/pueblo.creyentedesimojovel.9?fref=ts
Business Standard reports two killed 37 sickened after reactions to vaccines in Mexico
IMSS suspended Tuberculosis vaccine, Rotavirus and Hepatitis B after events in Chiapas
IMSS will investigate poisoning of children in Chiapas after being vaccinated

Article in it’s entirety, is compliments of www.SaneVax.org

 

Update: HPV vaccines and the Supreme Court of India#HPV#Vaccines#Android

jlvranes Leave a comment

 By Norma Erickson

January 2013, the government of India was ordered by their Supreme Court to file an answer to allegations put forth in a petition filed on behalf of Gramya Resource Centre for Women from Andhra Pradesh. This petition challenged the licensing of Gardasil and Cervarix for use in the private sector as well as attempts to introduce HPV vaccines for use in the public sector. The petition implicated the Drugs Controller for having licensed the vaccines without adequate research on safety and efficacy;  the Health Ministry for not carrying out an enquiry into licensing of these vaccines as ordered by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare in April 2010 and not taking any action on the report of the internal enquiry committee despite all alleged irregularities associated with the PATH project being confirmed.

October 2014, India’s Supreme Court Justices issued instructions for all petitioners and respondents in the ongoing case against to either serve the opposition with copies of affidavits filed and/or file any affidavits and rejoinder affidavits pertinent to the case within the next four weeks. The matter was then set for what was supposed to be a final hearing on January 13, 2015.

When the ’final’ hearing date arrived, several respondents had still not complied with these instructions. At least one of them went so far as to hold their two-and-a-half-foot tall affidavit for presentation to the Court on  January 13th. The Honorable Supreme Court Justices did not seem to be amused.

After hearing the evidence presented on January 13th, Justices Dipak Misra and Prafulla C. Pant issued an order reminding all participants of concerns raised in a prior hearing on 12 August 2014. Those concerns are as follows:

  • Did the Drugs Controller of India and the ICMR (Indian Council on Medical Research) follow proper protocol for the introduction of HPV vaccines prior to the use of said vaccines in the demonstration projects in India?
  • What actions were taken after the submission of the Parliamentary Committee’s 72nd report on August 30, 2014?
  • What were the reasons for choosing certain places in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh for the HPV vaccine demonstration projects?
  • What actually caused the deaths and other ailments experienced after HPV vaccine administration in said demonstration projects?
  • What steps were taken to monitor the safety of HPV vaccines by the Union of India and the State Governments who have an equal role in guarding the health of the nation?
  • Was proper consent given by the parents/guardians of all girls who were administered HPV vaccines, as the Justices been apprised?
  • What protocol is required to be observed/followed when this type of vaccination program is conducted?

The Honorable Supreme Court Justices deemed it appropriate to grant permission for the State of Gujarat, State of Andhra Pradesh, and State of Telangana to be added as parties to the current case.

The Justices also agreed to M/S Glaxosmithkline Asia Pvt. Ltd. and MSD Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., the companies responsible for manufacturing HPV vaccines, being served as respondents in the proceedings.

Justices Misra and Pant granted permission for the attorneys representing the petitioners to serve papers on the concerned Ethics Committees of all three States involved in the HPV demonstration projects.

In view of the fact that the above mentioned concerns had still not been adequately addressed, some respondents had failed to appear for prior hearings, and others had ignored requests for information or failed to submit affidavits in a timely manner the Justices included the following statements in the current order:

  • This Court hopes and trust(s) that on the next date of hearing, the Standing Counsel of all the States shall remain present and argue the matter.
  • The Union of India shall direct its competent authority to produce the file by which the Drugs Controller General of India approved HPV vaccines for use along with any other relevant documents to the Court and the Counsellors for the Petitioners in this case.
  • Learned Counsel for the Union of India shall apprise this Court what steps have been taken to comply with the recommendations put forth in the Parliamentary Committee’s Report on HPV vaccine demonstration projects in India.
  • Counsel for the State shall file their counter-affidavits within a period of four weeks.
  • The Union of India shall file their counter-affidavit (case #921/2013) within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, within two weeks therefrom.
  • By the same time, rejoinder affidavit to the counter-affidavit filed by PATH International to be filed.
  • The Advocate for ICMR shall produce the file dealing with HPV vaccines by the next date.
  • Regarding the ’concept of consent’ and the resultant deaths: it has been submitted that though innovative explanations have been given stating that some girls in the States of Gujarat and Telangana expired due to snake bite and fever, in actuality, it is due to the administration of vaccinations.
  • It was noted that though HPV vaccines were administered for the purpose of experimentation, there is no data with regard to the adverse effects faced by the young girls.
  • Counsel for the Union of India, the State of Gujarat, and the State of Telangana shall state by way of affidavit what the procedure and protocols are to be followed while obtaining informed consent. The stand taken by the Union of India and the States shall be clear and in consonance with law, for the affidavit is not expected to be filed in contravention of that has been envisaged in law.
  • The present public interest litigation has to be perceived from the point of view of rectification and caution for the future.
  • The ’caution’ would convey what steps have to be taken in the future so that this kind of grievances do not arise.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court order states:

Learned counsel appearing for the Union of India and the States of Gujarat and Telangana shall file their respective affidavits keeping in view the directions given herein-above. To elucidate, the affidavit filed by the Union of India shall contain explicitly (i) what steps they intend to take on the basis of the report given by the Parliamentary Standing Committee, (ii) what is the procedure to be followed for the purposes of consent and what steps are required to be taken to find out the sufferings, if any, by the persons who were vaccinated, and (iii) the liability of compensation, if any, to be paid and whose liability it would be.

Justices set the next hearing date for April 21, 2015.

 

References:

India: HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix make it to the Supreme Court

India: Supreme Court HPV Vaccine Controversy Continues

Original Supreme Court Documentation, go to this link – http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/casestatus_new/caseno_new_alt.asp then select “Writ Petition (civil)” as the case type; 558 as the case number; and 2012 as the year. Then click submit. Follow links from there to access original documents.

 Continue to the Article Here

This article in it’s entirety is compliments of www.sanevax.org

Judges demand answers after children die in controversial cancer vaccine trial in India#cdcwhistleblower#HearThisWell#Vaccines

jlvranes Leave a comment

There have been over 37,000. adverse events and 214 deaths from the Gardasil/Cervarix vaccines with no evidence of any benefit from the vaccine.  These figures are off of the November 2014 VAERS report and estimated to be only 1-10% of actual cases.  

By GETHIN CHAMBERLAIN IN INDORE, INDIA,

  •  Tribal girls were given shots of cervical cancer vaccines during trial
  • Children given Merck’s Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines
  • Petitioners also asked judges to investigate trials of new drug Gardasil 9
  • Drug has allegedly caused side-effects in children as young as nine
  • Investigation claims children were used as unwitting human guinea pigs
  • Supreme Court has given the government one month to provide answers

Judges in India’s Supreme Court have demanded answers after children died during a controversial cervical cancer vaccine trial.

Young tribal girls received shots of pharmaceutical company Merck’s Gardasil vaccine and Cervarix, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline.

The vaccines are given to girls as young as nine in many countries – including the UK and the US – to protect against the human papilloma virus, one of the major causes of cervical cancer.

But the Indian court yesterday heard a challenge by campaigners who claim the study – funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation – failed to obtain the informed consent of the children or their parents.

They say that a ‘study’ carried out for the foundation by a US organisation was in fact an illegal drugs trial.

Continue to the Article Here

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/

This is Why You Should Not Blindly Follow Your Doctor’s Advice to Vaccinate#Pregnancy#Baby#Family

jlvranes Leave a comment

by Michelle Goldstien

 The subject of vaccines is extremely controversial. Most individuals have been taught from an early age that vaccines are safe and prevent disease. I wish that both of these statements were true, but I am now convinced, after extensive research and experience, that vaccines do not prevent disease and that they are far from safe.

Tremendous pressure is wielded by physicians, hospitals, public schools, family and friends to vaccinate. You must come to your own conclusions and stand firm, should you decided not to vaccinate. It is imperative to take time to do some independent research on this medical procedure. The health consequences of vaccinations, which include death, cannot be easily reversed, if at all…

Read the Entire Article Here

www.vactruth.com

The HPV vaccine: injuries and treatment#Vaccines#HPV#iBelieve

jlvranes Leave a comment

By Stig Gerdes, Guest Author

The HPV vaccine Gardasil was introduced into the childhood vaccination program in Denmark in 2009. The decision was made already in 2006 by the former Minister of Health Lars Løkke Rasmussen.

In the spring of 2013 there came reports in the Danish press and on Facebook that young girls/women had developed some symptoms characterized by damage to the skin, nervous system, immune system, etc. These symptoms were associated to the Gardasil vaccine.

It was claimed that the vaccination was stopped in Denmark and that the injured were diagnosed and treated for all the many serious damages which were described. The problem is that many did not know and still do not know, the strange symptoms they experienced after Gardasil injections are vaccine injuries.

The health authorities responded by promoting the vaccine and saying the serious injuries of the HPV vaccine was Functional disorders, caused by psychological reasons. The Danish Health and Medicines Authority however would increase surveillance of the HPV vaccine, but nothing was communicated about this, and the doctors did not get any information about the strong suspicion, and they were not informed about the contraindications for the HPV vaccine, it was quite obvious that The Danish Health and Medicines Authority, SSI and The Danish Cancer Society had a financial interest in promoting the vaccine.

At one point, however it was admitted that the HPV vaccine can injure the youngsters. The Minister of Health Nick Hækkerup therefore answers:

“The Danish Health and Medicines Authority consider it important to ensure that patients receive a comprehensive diagnose and treatment, and there is a particular challenge for The Regions to ensure that for patients with severe and unexplained symptoms  this requires collaboration across specialties.”

Subsequently, it was asked for an expert committee to assist The Regions in diagnosing and treating the injured. The Regions thought this was a good idea, but The Danish Health and Medicines Authority refused.

It is important to keep in mind that new HPV injured patients will continue to emerge, because we continue to vaccinate!

Since then, the focus has raised on the HPV vaccine safety outside Denmark, due to healthcare professionals and people around the world linking the severe injuries and possible deaths to the HPV vaccine.

India has cancelled the HPV vaccine trials after 7 deaths and multiple adverse events after vaccine administration.

Japan has pulled the government recommendation for HPV vaccines and replaced their top three government health officials after discovering the high incidence of adverse reactions after HPV vaccine administration.

Spain has scheduled trials.

France discusses the pros and cons.

England’s vaccination victims have been speaking in The Parliament.

Columbia is in turmoil due to deaths and severe injuries ……

The association of HPV Update has held two meetings convened by The Ministry of Health. The Regions and the Danish Health and Medicines Authority were also invited to discuss the frequency and severity of injuries caused by the HPV vaccine.

A worldwide non-profit organization was founded in 2010, SaneVax (Safe affordable, necessary and effective vaccines) in response to the HPV vaccine controversy. This is the link www.sanevax.org

In Denmark, the pressure on the Health Authorities has been so strong that the Minister of Health, Nick Hækkerup, has put diagnosing and treatment in the hands of the Regions.

To make sure that ordinary people and professionals can recognize the HPV vaccine damages, I have summarized these as they are mentioned in the manufacturer Merck’s “leaflet.” The Danish Authorities have not translated adequately, and therefore many of the adverse events are not on the Danish translation. It is a big mistake!

The adverse events are listed below. It must be remembered that the individual injured can have many symptoms at the same time. Most HPV vaccine injured have over 15 symptoms simultaneously.

  • Anaphylactic reaction
  • Autoimmune diseases
  • Inflammation of the pancreas
  • Inflammation of the stomach / intestines
  • Inflammation in other tissues, such as muscles and tendons
  • Inflammation of the sinuses
  • Inflammation of the bladder
  • Inflammation of the lungs
  • Inflammation of the brain
  • Inflammation of the kidney / pelvic
  • Chest pain, they are as violent as by a blood clot in the heart or lungs.
  • Fainting
  • Cell changes in the cervix (if at the time of vaccination, the HP virus in the blood).
  • Death
  • Diarrhoea
  • Fever
  • Guillain-Barre syndrome
  • Headache
  • Cough
  • Swollen lymph nodes
  • Hypersensitivity
  • Flu-like symptoms
  • Weakness
  • Chills (fever)
  • Jaw Pain
  • Nausea
  • Paralysis
  • Joint pain
  • Muscle pain
  • Hives
  • Vomiting
  • POTS (high heart rate, low blood pressure)
  • Insomnia
  • Spasms in the lungs bronchi
  • Dizziness
  • Toothache
  • Fatigue

If you have many of these symptoms, consult your doctor. Bring this article with you, so he can diagnose HPV vaccine injury, and invalidate the diagnosis Functional suffering – and therefore refer you to one of The Region’s hospitals or orthomolecular doctors who can provide you proper treatment paid by The Region.

The characteristic of the HPV injured is that they largely tell the same history of severe tiredness, general aches and pain throughout the body, headache, fainting, seizures, etc.., so that they spend most of their time in bed, and are unable to carry out their schooling, work or household responsibilities. In short term, their functional and work are reduced from 100% to below 30%.

It is encouraging that there is now a symptomatic and perhaps curative treatment!

The reason for the HPV vaccine injuries is finding mitochondria (the cellular powerhouses) at the cellular level destroyed by metals such as lead, mercury, aluminium and artificial HPV DNA.

The treatment is well known in the form of intravenous vitamin C and Glutathione, as well as supplement of vitamins and salts, and to avoid foods that contain metals and allergens.

Several young women have been treated successfully. How long the treatment should continue, is yet unknown, but it seems that intravenous therapy improves symptoms rapidly (i.e. after 6-12 treatments) and may be discontinued after a period, so the injured can continue taking antioxidants, vitamins and salts by mouth.

It should be strongly emphasized that the treated relapse if treatment is stopped and the good effect returns when treatment is resumed.

The good thing about the treatment is that it has been used for many years for other disorders – with good effect, although not recognized by The Health Authorities in Denmark.

One big advantage is this treatment has great effect and no adverse events; unlike HPV vaccines which have plenty of adverse events and has no effect!

The intravenous treatment may be performed by the patient’s GP, but when The Minister of Health has handed over the responsibility for the diagnosis and treatment to The Regions, it must be the hospitals around The Regions that are responsible for treating the HPV vaccine injured when the diagnosis is made. The diagnosis is currently clinically, but safe laboratory tests are under development.

Treatment Protocol:

The intravenous treatment consists of vitamin C administered 2 times a week and Glutathione 1 time per week. Start example is: IV. Vitamin C  25 grams in 250-500 ml of Ringer’s Lactate administered over 3-4 hours, for example, Monday and Friday. Iv. Glutathione Wednesdays, 200-1.200 mg administered in 100-250 ml of saline over 1-1 ½ hours. Vitamin C is gradually increased to 50 grams after 4 infusions. Glutathione increased from 200-1.200 mg after some infusions.

It’s worth knowing:

By IV. Vitamin C the patient are recommended to drink at least 1 ½ litres of water.

The rest of the day the patient are recommended to continue to drink much water.

In order to strengthen the intravenous treatment it is recommended to make a vitamin and mineral plan for supplements. A significant and effective action is seen by the following vitamin and mineral combinations by mouth:

Vitamin C in large doses, Vitamin E, Selenium, Q10, Omega 3, Magnesium, Vitamin D3, Vitamin B complex, Vitamin B12 (Methylcobalamin), Lime, Zinc, Alpha Lipoic acid and N-Acetyl Cysteine.

The dosage and selection of the above should be performed by a specialist in the area. Intravenous treatments should be performed by physicians with adequate experience in the field. The patients’ safety comes first.

Insomnia is a known adverse event after the HPV vaccine. In order to improve sleep it is recommended to take Melatonin which is released over 6 hours.

Avoid food and drinks containing sugar, avoid light products too.

E-numbers and aluminium are found everywhere – try to avoid it. E171, E173 and E621 and aluminium should be avoided completely. There are aluminium (E173) and titanium dioxin (171) everywhere. Baking soda, white flour, white sugar, toothpaste, deodorants, cosmetics, candy, seasoning and often in pills…

The HPV vaccine provides food intolerance frequently. Pay attention to the quality of food. Until the immune system is in place and the nervous system damages are restored, all food is recommended to be organic. This also applies to dietary supplements.

This article in it’s entirety, is compliments of SaneVax.org