Vaccinate and Risk Shaken Baby Syndrome
Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine-Induced Encephalitis?
by Harold E. Buttram, MD
ABSTRACT
The evidence continues to grow that vaccines given to children may be causing serious neurological problems, including brain hemorrhages which are being defined as “shaken baby syndrome”, resulting in prison terms for parents.
Shaken Baby Syndrome or Adverse Reaction to Vaccination?
Shaken Baby Syndrome Diagnosis On Shaky Ground
By Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.
Abstract
An epidemic of accusations against parents and baby sitters of Shaken Baby Syndrome is sweeping the developed world. The United States and the United Kingdom are in the forefront of such questionable practice. Brain (mainly subdural, less often subarachnoid) and retinal haemorrhages, retinal detachments, and rib and other bone ‘fractures’ are considered pathognomic. However, the reality of these injuries is very different and well documented: the vast majority occur after the administration of childhood vaccines and a minority of cases are due to documented birth injuries and pre-eclamptic and eclamptic states of the mothers.
Evidence that vaccines cause brain and retinal haemorrhages and increased fragility of bones, has been published in refereed medical journals. That this has been to a great extent due to the depletion of vitamin C reserves resulting in acute scurvy, has also been published. I refer to such articles and demonstrate that there is a viable differential diagnosis available explaining the observed injuries in what is called the Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) as non-traumatic injuries, and that the diagnosis of SBS is an artifactual incorrect evaluation of the cause of such injuries; it has resulted in unspeakable injustices and suffering for the affected individuals and their families, and deprived the surviving babies of their parental care by replacing it with foster care. It does not reflect well on the justice and medical systems in the developed world which are, sadly, characterized by blindness to the most obvious and victimization of the innocent. Those who inject babies with great numbers of vaccines within short periods of time in the first months of life, often ignoring the observed serious reactions to the previous lots of vaccines, are not only the accusers of innocent carers, but are not prosecuted or brought to justice; quite to the contrary, they continue injecting babies with toxic cocktails of vaccines and creating further innumerable cases of grievous bodily harm and death.
Published in the “Journal of Australasian College of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine”, Vol. 20 No. 2; August 2001
I found this report to be very informative and helpful. Every parent would be wise to peruse when researching vaccinations.
Vaccination adverse effects displayed in Poland’s study
Neurologic adverse events following vaccination
Sienkiewicz D.*, Kułak W., Okurowska-Zawada B., Paszko-Patej G.
Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation of the Medical University of Bialystok, Poland
ABSTRACT
The present review summarizes data on
neurological adverse events following vaccination
in the relation to intensity, time of onset, taking into
account the immunological and non-immunological
mechanisms. The authors described the physiological development of the immune system and the
possible immune system responses following
vaccination. Toxic property of thimerosal – a
mercury-containing preservative used in some
vaccines was presented. The neurological complications after vaccination were described. The role
of vaccination in the natural course of infectious
diseases and the current immunizations schedule in
Poland was discussed.
Key words: vaccination, neurologic adverse events
following vaccination, immunization schedules
Prog Health Sci 2012, Vol 2 , No1 Neurologic adverse events vaccination
Elevated Levels of Measles Antibodies in Children with Autism
Abstract
My family and I are relocating to SLC, UT. It was necessary to turn in either a Utah school immunization record or personal exception form to complete admissions to a local private school. This is customary for schools in the state. I believe not necessary for home schoolers but uncertain in that regard.
With work taking us to a number of different states I find the process of receiving immunization information and/or requesting a waiver fairly similar from state to state in the U.S.
Today I was pleasantly surprised. The nurse at the health department was respectable in his speech and not condescending. Typically the most common denominator in our visits over the past 20+ years is a verbally hostile nurse and/or doctor when requesting an exemption. Ironically another common thread is a biased viewpoint with little study from the employee of additional research outside of pharmaceutical, conflict of interest research.
I received a basic packet of information displaying only one view. The nurse could tell I was familiar with research on immunizations and said that he didn’t feel necessary to cover much with me since I had been through this process many times.. He calmly filled out my waiver. I probably spent 15-20 minutes at most in his office. I thanked him for his respectful communication.
He did apologize for past experiences when I have met with a biased employee.
When discussing ingredients in the tetanus shot upon my request, the nurse pulled the “pink book” out of the cupboard. He said every office that administers immunizations should have one. The book listed ingredients for all the shots. He was surprised to find that their office appeared to have Thirmerosal in the vaccination. We both agreed that the packaging holding a vaccination should list all the ingredients. The nurse mentioned that he thought there were still some ingredients not listed in some of the vaccinations. We both agreed that vaccinations should have ingredients all listed. He said if the pharmaceutical companies have nothing to hide then everything should be listed.
I am so pleased with an open and honest discourse. So happy that so little of my time was taken and no charge for the waiver.